Why Conventional Doctors think the way they do.

When people first hear about alternative medical treatments they often ask the obvious question: " If this treatment is so effective, why doesn't my doctor know about it? "

According to John R. Lee, MD, of Sebastopol California, there are a number of reasons for this. " The first reason lies in the fact that the selection process of medical students depends on large part on college grades. Students get high grades when they simply repeat in their tests exactly what the teacher wants them to say. Students who question what they are being taught, on the other hand, usually do not get the higher grades. Medical schools, therefore, are filled with students who are good at adopting given 'wisdom', but not necessarily good at thinking and questioning, because they have learned to follow precepts handed to them by presumed authorities."

The second reason that accounts for the way many doctors think is that medical schools tend to be organized into organ-specific departments. " The idea of an underlying link between these different departmentalized diseases is nonexistent within this framework, " Dr Lee says

doctor

" Furthermore, the influence of nutrition on the way cells function is ignored or derided by many department heads who defend their own orthodox concepts ."

The third reason is one of simple economics. " When leaving medical school, the young doctor finds him/herself in a system that rewards what is called 'rescue medicine'. or interventions that treat symptoms, " Dr Lee explains. " There is no reward, and there way well be scorn from fellow doctors, for those who take the time and trouble to try and prevent illness or attempt to correct nutritional deficiencies which may be causing the patient's condition. Medical record keeping and billing for insurance also require doctors to adhere to this superficial, organ classification of disease. Economic rewards follow only from sticking to this particular model of ill-health and treatment."

Malpractice is another great fear among doctors. " People should note that the definition of malpractice is not whether the practice is 'good' or 'bad' for the patient, but rather if the practice in question is what other doctors in the given locality normally do or prescribe," says Dr Lee. He adds that doctors also, quite naturally, seek the professional and social approval of their peers. " Both of these factors conspire to 'keep the doctor in line', limiting the likelihood of a doctor adopting some unconventional practices techniques."

View Source
medical book